Uniform trade secrets act new jersey

Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.

Trending News

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

Morgan Lewis Law Firm AMLaw 50 American Lawyer

Email 215.963.5000 HB Ad Slot New Jersey Adopts Uniform Trade Secrets Act Thursday, January 12, 2012

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

On January 9, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act (NJTSA). The NJTSA brings New Jersey in line with 46 other states and the District of Columbia, all of which have enacted a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The NJTSA provides to New Jersey businesses a new tool that can be used in the event of actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets.

Prior to the enactment of this new statute, New Jersey did not have statutory protection for trade secrets. Businesses in New Jersey could only enforce their trade secrets by bringing actions based on common law, as the federal trade secret statute is limited to criminal actions. While other federal statutes often apply in cases involving trade secret theft, such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, or the Copyright Act, these statutes all have different elements and are not targeted specifically for the protection of trade secrets.

The NJTSA defines a “trade secret” as any information, such as a formula, pattern, business data compilation, device, or process, that

  1. derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and
  2. is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. To state a claim under the NJTSA, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant obtained trade secrets by “improper means.” The NJTSA defines “improper means” as any unauthorized access to or use of a business’s trade secrets. Discovery byindependent invention, reverse engineering, observation of the information in public use, and other “proper means” provides a complete defense to an NJTSA claim.

The NJTSA authorizes courts to enter injunctive relief to prevent both actual and threatened misappropriation. The NJTSA also provides for damages for both the actual loss suffered by the plaintiff and for any unjust enrichment of the defendant caused by the misappropriation. Damages may also include the imposition of a reasonable royalty for unauthorized disclosure or use. In cases involving the willful and malicious misappropriation of a trade secret, the court may award punitive damages in an amount not exceeding twice that awarded for actual damages and unjust enrichment.

Finally, and very importantly, attorney’s fees and costs may be awarded to a prevailing party where willful and malicious misappropriation exists, a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith, or a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith.

Copyright © 2024 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Current Public Notices

Published: 10 September, 2024 Published: 4 September, 2024 Published: 30 August, 2024 Published: 30 August, 2024 Published: 28 August, 2024 Published: 27 August, 2024 HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

Current Legal Analysis

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

More from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Upcoming Legal Education Events

Practising Law Institute New York

Practising Law Institute New York

Barnes & Thornburg Law Firm Logo

Barnes & Thornburg Law Firm Logo

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free-to-use, no-log-in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates, or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys, or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws, the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 2070 Green Bay Rd., Suite 178, Highland Park, IL 60035 Telephone (708) 357-3317 or toll-free (877) 357-3317. If you would like to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2024 National Law Forum, LLC